Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:51
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Rory McIlroy makes an 8, barely breaks 80 in missing cut at RBC Canadian Open - NBC Sports
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Doctors use poo pills to flush out dangerous superbugs - BBC
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Your TRICARE Checklist for Moving - TRICARE Newsroom (.mil)
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
10 candidates who could fill the Dallas Stars’ head coaching vacancy - Dallas News
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
How do I develop the patience to read books?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
5 foods to add to your diet to prevent magnesium deficiency - Times of India
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.